Saturday, December 11, 2010

Well, we all survived so there's that.

With crits over and the semester coming to an end and I can't help but retreat into the dim light of my apartment to mull of the many questions (new and old) I have about painting.
The window in my bedroom faces the base of a large tree. The roots snake out and down into the rich wet earth beneath them, the ground beset with the fallen leaves and the debris of many seasons. Behind the tree there is a chain link fence and a pale yellow house beyond it. I see the sky in patches looking up, the leaves of the tree above covering it like the shapes of countries over seas on a map. At night, like it is now, the leaves turn a dark mossy green in the orange security light. They darken and cool toward center, their shadows laying like expressionist brushstrokes across the low house siding.

The studio feels unsettled to me right now, paintings and projects scattered about, stacks leaning against the walls in various states of finish. The still life set up for my latest portrait painting covers most of the floor space on the right side of the room. The long table has a yellow cloth on it with two mock Japanese lantern style lamps, three or four bottles of wine, a spilled wine glass (which my friend actually spilled while sitting), two cakes and a clear glass bong and light green smoking pipe.
A close friend, Drake, is sitting for me. We have had one session together so far and the painting is still in a sketchy state, drawing lines exist in many places. I am using a set up and pose similar to that of the Carvaggio painting The Young Bacchus. Drake is in a place in his life right now where he has just graduated school and is still working and living in Bloomington. He is not sure what the next stage of his life is yet. He is happy with the moment. He lives life with an eye open to possibilities but no plan of the future. The still life around him reflects the habits we have and the things we use to have a good time.
While I am approaching this painting with somewhat of a sense of humor I don't want it to be a complete bastardization of its visual source of inspiration. I am interested in the idea of a Dionysian view toward life and how youth is related to that. The freedom of a certain age. The allowance of chaos and structure to exist alongside each other.

I do not know where I am going from here. I have new ideas for paintings and a desire to start working on them. But I can't shake my vexations about painting in general. I decided to paint entirely from life this semester, I desired more than anything to spend time with people and paint them. Taking watercolor with Tim also made painting other places and temporal situations a new possibility for me. It has also been helpful in teaching me more about color and cultivating a closer eye for the world around me. I have come to love looking at things and deconstructing them in a painting language. I hope to continue using watercolors and have plans to paint in the basement of my work sometime before or during break. I want to start using oil paints at my apartment and other places that I find interesting and can set up regularly. So then...

My vexations? My questions? All of these concerns swirling around in my head?

Am I doing enough? Is this recent interest in the immediate world around me important enough to be my continuing body of work? How can I get previous interests such as gender and religion back into my paintings working in this new way? Should every painting be led by an idea? What are ideas? What does it mean to be a painter painting representational spaces with people today?

Caleb said something in my critique that I am holding on to. I wanted to capture the identity of my sitters - of this time in their lives, of their existence. He didn't see it. He saw that I struggled to paint these people. He saw the image in the paintings, the representation of a person with paint. But I don't care about the image if it isn't getting to the truth I am seeking.
Everyone congratulated me on the critique going well and it mostly did. But I can't get over what might not have been there. I don't want my paintings to be purely formal. I don't want people to see them and their opinions to rest on the surface. Barry said that he thought the paintings had to get richer, that I owed it to myself. He asked me if I feel any responsibility being a contemporary figure painter. I guess I believe that if I have any responsibility it is to be true to how people are. I sought to do portraits because I found the nature of them to be quite complex. Working only with what someone gives you physically to try and express a multitude of layers within that single image. But I am beginning to realize that maybe the paintings weren't complex enough, that maybe the tableau of a portrait could be limiting.
I still want to paint people. I need to avoid the distance which paid models add. I am not interested in that level of anonymity in my work. But I think I need to open up to the paintings (compositionally, structurally) more and explore the possibilities of what they could be separate from their subjects.
Really, I just need to paint and I am spending all this time ruminating. If anyone has any thoughts, concerns, annoyances etc. PLEASE share them.

1 comment:

  1. Hi Casey! GREAT to hear from you, and what a beautifully written piece! Obviously you are keeping sharp with your writing as well as painting. One thing that struck me in reading your post is your desire to have the real aura of a person come through, but perhaps to also have your relationship with the person to show through, even if that "relationship" only lasts the painting session. As usual, I think finding the best process for what you're wishing for might be most useful. In turn, this reminded me of three painters in particular, all of whom I believe achieve this sense of painting being more than just the image, in some degree: Alice Neel, Francis Bacon, and John Sonsini. Sonsini is a contemporary figure painter in LA, and I was JUST reading an interview with him in "Artillery" where he was saying that likes to paint in a space that is a little too small for him, the model, and the canvas. Bacon and Neel had similarly small studios, and it makes me wonder whether that forced intimacy made for deeper connection in the painting itself. I thought of this when you mentioned your friend spilling the wine glass in your crowded studio. What if you stretched a canvas as big as you could fit in your studio--so big that you could not "adequately" back up, so that you (and your model) were forced to exist within the painting's parameters while you were making it? Perhaps you would be forced to no longer see the canvas as a frame for an image, but rather the field on which your time together was recorded? Would the canvas become more of a mirror? Would this "expand" the tableau of a portrait in a way you found healthy? Would this actually open up composition, since you would not necessarily be able to "see" the whole composition, forcing it to be less tied to naturalistic space? I of course have no idea, but for nothing else it might be a fun experiment. In any case, it is great to be back in touch with you and your always dedicated thoughts. Regardless of all else, just hang in there and keep trying! I'd love to see some of the results...

    ReplyDelete